<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 111220.Turbotax-Odd-Dependent-Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.turbotax.intuit.com/2011/12/16/10-odd-dependent-questions/111220-turbotax-odd-dependent-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.turbotax.intuit.com/2011/12/16/10-odd-dependent-questions/111220-turbotax-odd-dependent-questions/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s all about the refund</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://blog.turbotax.intuit.com/2011/12/16/10-odd-dependent-questions/111220-turbotax-odd-dependent-questions/#comment-34226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Debbie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intuitturbotax.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/111220-turbotax-odd-dependent-questions.png#comment-34226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must say, as substantially as I eyeonjd reading what you had to say, I couldnt help but lose interest after a while.  Its as if you had a great grasp on the subject matter, but you forgot to include your readers.  Perhaps you should think about this from additional than 1 angle.  Or maybe you shouldnt generalise so much.  Its better if you think about what others may have to say instead of just going for a gut reaction to the subject.  Think about adjusting your own believed process and giving others who may read this the benefit of the doubt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say, as substantially as I eyeonjd reading what you had to say, I couldnt help but lose interest after a while.  Its as if you had a great grasp on the subject matter, but you forgot to include your readers.  Perhaps you should think about this from additional than 1 angle.  Or maybe you shouldnt generalise so much.  Its better if you think about what others may have to say instead of just going for a gut reaction to the subject.  Think about adjusting your own believed process and giving others who may read this the benefit of the doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
